+ - 0:00:00
Notes for current slide
  • Here to tell a story about rivers, and an organism which has evolved within these watersheds and yet what we see today is largely a very different ecosystem than what these species experienced 200+ years ago.

  • As freshwater systems and biota are rapidly declining globally, conservation efforts will require assessment of the adaptive capacity of populations to rapid environmental change.

  • Small populations with limited genetic diversity may have reduced adaptive potential and difficulty responding to future environmental change.

Notes for next slide

Dammed Rivers: Genetic Signatures of Altered Flow Regimes in a River Breeding Frog (Rana boylii)


Ryan Peek

PhD Candidate, Ecology

2017/10/25 09:45am


1 / 30
  • Here to tell a story about rivers, and an organism which has evolved within these watersheds and yet what we see today is largely a very different ecosystem than what these species experienced 200+ years ago.

  • As freshwater systems and biota are rapidly declining globally, conservation efforts will require assessment of the adaptive capacity of populations to rapid environmental change.

  • Small populations with limited genetic diversity may have reduced adaptive potential and difficulty responding to future environmental change.

Acknowledgements

  • Mike Miller & Sean O'Rourke

  • Center for Watershed Sciences

  • Brad Shaffer

  • Amy Lind

  • Corey Luna, many field helpers, SYRCL, Sierra Streams Institute

2 / 30

California Rivers

N. American freshwater species projected extinction rate is 5x higher than terrestrial animals (Ricciardi and Rasmussen, 1999)

3 / 30

The face of the water, in time, became a wonderful book--a book that was a dead language to the uneducated passenger, but which told its mind to me without reserve… And it was not a book to be read once and thrown aside, for it had a new story to tell every day” –Mark Twain (Two Views of the Mississippi, 1883)

  • Humans rely on freshwater systems not only for drinking water, but also for agriculture, transportation, energy production, industrial processes, waste disposal, and the extraction of fish and other products.

  • Human settlements worldwide are concentrated near freshwater ecosystems — over half of the world’s population lives within 20 km of a permanent river (Small and Cohen, 1999).

  • Freshwater fisheries valued globally at $5.58 billion/year and ecosystem services of wetlands valued $70 billion/year (IUCN Review, Darwall et al. 2008)

CA Anthropogenic Legacy: Mining

4 / 30

Hydraulic mining originated out of ancient Roman techniques that used water to excavate soft underground deposits. Romans invented “hushing”, certain landscapes in Spain still bear marks of this highly invasive mining technique. called “hydraulicking” by miners of CA, technique still used to remove hillsides

CA Anthropogenic Legacy: Mining

Permanently changed the geomorphology/ecology of CA watersheds

4 / 30

Hydraulic mining originated out of ancient Roman techniques that used water to excavate soft underground deposits. Romans invented “hushing”, certain landscapes in Spain still bear marks of this highly invasive mining technique. called “hydraulicking” by miners of CA, technique still used to remove hillsides

CA Anthropogenic Legacy: Mining

Permanently changed the geomorphology/ecology of CA watersheds

Estimated 8x more material excavated from Yuba/Bear/American Watersheds than during construction of entire Panama Canal

4 / 30

Hydraulic mining originated out of ancient Roman techniques that used water to excavate soft underground deposits. Romans invented “hushing”, certain landscapes in Spain still bear marks of this highly invasive mining technique. called “hydraulicking” by miners of CA, technique still used to remove hillsides

First used by Edward Matteson near Nevada City, California in 1853 during the California Gold Rush.

By the mid-1880s, it is estimated that 11 million ounces of gold (worth approximately US$7.5 billion at mid-2006 prices) had been recovered by hydraulic mining in the California Gold Rush.

CA Dammed Rivers

5 / 30

Hydroelectric power generation comprises over half of all renewable energy generation in California (California Energy Commission 2010

Majority (84%) of dams are for: 47% Irrigation (n=709) 23% Water supply (n=342) 14% Hydroelectric (n=207)

CA Dammed Rivers

  • Over 1,400 large dams (NID 2007)

  • Residential energy demands expected to increase by 24% by 2035 (US EIA 2010)

5 / 30

Hydroelectric power generation comprises over half of all renewable energy generation in California (California Energy Commission 2010

Majority (84%) of dams are for: 47% Irrigation (n=709) 23% Water supply (n=342) 14% Hydroelectric (n=207)

Foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii)

6 / 30

Foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii)

  • Obligate river breeding frog, uses wide range of habitat, but has disappeared from over 50% of historical range

  • Being evaluated as candidate for state and federal listing under ESA

6 / 30

Foothill yellow-legged frogs (Rana boylii)

  • Obligate river breeding frog, uses wide range of habitat, but has disappeared from over 50% of historical range

  • Being evaluated as candidate for state and federal listing under ESA

6 / 30

BUT: Frogs Are Still Here!

Indian Creek, NF American watershed

7 / 30

And Here:

Mainstem River, NF American watershed

8 / 30

But barely holding on here: (Slate Ck: North Yuba)

9 / 30

Frogs As Hydrologic Indicators

10 / 30

Frogs As Hydrologic Indicators

  • R. boylii strongly linked with local hydrology, and thus the watershed history

10 / 30

Frogs As Hydrologic Indicators

  • R. boylii strongly linked with local hydrology, and thus the watershed history

  • Spawning timing & habitat selection is tied to receding flow cues & increasing water temperatures

10 / 30
  • 90% of eggs observed in Sierras were in shallow, sheltered waters (n=147) (Bondi et al. 2013)

    • < 0.67 m total depth
    • < 0.15 m/s velocity

Case Study

11 / 30

Case Study

Has river (flow) regulation caused genetic fragmentation in R. boylii?

11 / 30

Expect flow regulation to limit connectivity between populations, thus causing loss of genetic variation/diversity, inbreeding risk goes up and pop bottlenecks, risk of extirpation increases in small populations.

Case Study

Has river (flow) regulation caused genetic fragmentation in R. boylii?

Can we quantify this genetic signature with specific hydrologic metrics of flow impairment?

11 / 30

Expect flow regulation to limit connectivity between populations, thus causing loss of genetic variation/diversity, inbreeding risk goes up and pop bottlenecks, risk of extirpation increases in small populations.

Case Study

Has river (flow) regulation caused genetic fragmentation in R. boylii?

Can we quantify this genetic signature with specific hydrologic metrics of flow impairment?

Use genome-wide methods (RADSeq/RAPTURE)1

[1] Ali et al. 2016

11 / 30

Expect flow regulation to limit connectivity between populations, thus causing loss of genetic variation/diversity, inbreeding risk goes up and pop bottlenecks, risk of extirpation increases in small populations.

  • Methods like RADSeq leverage genome-wide genetic variation to provide insight into ecological/population health
  • Many amphibian species cryptic/lack data, Large genome size, assessment and monitoring hard to do
  • restriction site-associated DNA sequencing, highly efficient genotyping across thousands of individual samples for targeted loci
  • For frogs, can sample with non-invasive methods using mouth swabs, or tadpole tail clips

Study Area

12 / 30

Study Area: American Watershed

13 / 30

These are already small populations! Mainstem may have been the source, or the highway that connected these tributary sites.

using the mean pairwise comparison value for Fst and mean river distance, so if 11 sites, approx 55 possible combinations combn(11, m = 2)

Hydrographs: Unimpaired

14 / 30

Hydrographs: Unimpaired

15 / 30

Flow management will become even more critical and difficult under warming climate (more rain/less snow, more extreme events and less predictable patterns)

Hydrographs: Impaired (Hydropeaking)

16 / 30

Hydrographs: Impaired (Hydropeaking)

17 / 30

RESULTS

18 / 30

PCA: Assessing Population Structure

N. Sierra Nevada samples mostly show structure by watershed (n=7,548 SNPs)

-0.10-0.050.000.050.10-0.2-0.10.0
N. Sierra Nevada: PC1 (2.1%) / PC2 (1.37%)(BEA,REG)(MFA,REG)(MFY,REG)(NFA,UNREG)(NFF,REG)(NFY,UNREG)(SFA,REG)(SFY,REG)PC1PC2Riverreg
19 / 30

Why does structure matter? Indicates loss of variation, potential limited connectivity, small population sizes, isolation, divergence, etc.

PCA: Unimpaired Watershed

Limited structure, greater similarity across subpops. (n=8,739 SNPs)

-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.10.00.1-0.4-0.20.0
North Fork American: PC1 (1.59%) / PC2 (1.5%)NFANFA-BUNCNFA-EUCHDSNFA-EUCHUSNFA-INDCNFA-NFNFANFA-PONDNFA-ROBRNFA-SAICNFA-SHICNFA-SLARPC1PC2Pop
20 / 30

PCA: Impaired (hydropeaking) Watershed

Strong structure, greater divergence across subpops. (n=8,854 SNPs)

-0.10.00.10.20.3-0.2-0.10.00.10.2
Middle Fork American: PC1 (6.14%) / PC2 (3.15%)MFA-AMECMFA-GASCMFA-TODCMFA-US-RNFMFA-SCRUB-LC-USRUB-USPHSFA-CAMIPC1PC2Pop
21 / 30

FST (Wright 1950):

a measure of population differentiation due to genetic structure

  • Scaled 0=(panmixis) to 1=(completely different)

22 / 30

FST vs. River Distance

23 / 30

FST vs. Stream Order

24 / 30

Genomic Variation

25 / 30




Loss of genetic diversity in regulated systems >> unregulated

26 / 30

Are metrics of flow strongest factor in genomic patterns?

Can we integrate genomics with environmental flow management?

27 / 30

Boosted Regression Tree Models

28 / 30

Summary:

Flow alteration is having a direct impact on a hydrologically sensitive species at a genomic level

29 / 30

Summary:

Flow alteration is having a direct impact on a hydrologically sensitive species at a genomic level

The current population trajectory is highly concerning in Sierras

29 / 30

Summary:

Flow alteration is having a direct impact on a hydrologically sensitive species at a genomic level

The current population trajectory is highly concerning in Sierras

Flow management and listing distinct population segments may afford some protection...

29 / 30

Summary:

Flow alteration is having a direct impact on a hydrologically sensitive species at a genomic level

The current population trajectory is highly concerning in Sierras

Flow management and listing distinct population segments may afford some protection...

RAPTURE/RADSeq is a powerful & effective method

29 / 30
  • (i.e., small pops. with limited connectivity, low diversity)
  • RAPTURE/RADSeq is a powerful and effective method
  • Genomics should be an integral component in assessments & monitoring in future conservation efforts
  • Targeted research assessing environmental flows & ecological traits across taxa (fish, BMI, frogs)

Thank you!

Slides : ryanpeek.github.io/presentations

30 / 30

Acknowledgements

  • Mike Miller & Sean O'Rourke

  • Center for Watershed Sciences

  • Brad Shaffer

  • Amy Lind

  • Corey Luna, many field helpers, SYRCL, Sierra Streams Institute

2 / 30
Paused

Help

Keyboard shortcuts

, , Pg Up, k Go to previous slide
, , Pg Dn, Space, j Go to next slide
Home Go to first slide
End Go to last slide
Number + Return Go to specific slide
b / m / f Toggle blackout / mirrored / fullscreen mode
c Clone slideshow
p Toggle presenter mode
t Restart the presentation timer
?, h Toggle this help
Esc Back to slideshow